You can tell what's going on by looking at the file sizes of a photo file for example I just checked one that I took last month. What I mean is you can only work with what you've got, and with raw images you get everything that the sensor saw so that you have the best chance of getting the maximum from it. I'd just add that the old GIGO rule applies in this situation - garbage in, garbage out. I was unaware that XnView only uses the JPG within the DNG file - thank you for pointing this out. You do need a full raw converter program such as the free darktable or raw therapee to take advantage of a raw file.Thanks for this - I usually use FastStone, and occasionally using XnView for other editing. You do need a full raw converter program such as the free darktable or raw therapee to take advantage of a raw file. Result: I fear your approach is actually a full waste of the capabilities of the raw files. It then also can work with those jpgs to adjust them and create a changed output.īut essentially feeding a DNG into xnview and adjusting things there is 100% the same as feeding it a jpg debeloped in the camera. ![]() Xnview can open raw files in the way that it displays the jpg images embedded into the raw file. I am not sure about irfanview, but relatively sure about faststone and xnview.Īnd I fear you are believing something wrong here… ![]() UniWB would you simply choose the desired WB in your RAW editor content in the knowledge that no channel is blown in the original image? Some help with understanding how to us HDR scene without the HDR tonemapping most think of when composing hdr images Once you know what is happening you can apply the right corrections your raw converter I would then look at how your camera handles baseline exposure I would also look at finding a way to view your cameras raw file, this will give you a better idea as to what is contained in the raw file There would be some need to configure your camera so that you have a better representation Are in need of tools to instantly adjust white balance and exposure (brightness) right while browsing through the shot.Yes it can be done to some extent, the histogram in LV would be your best bet. Are forced to use JPEG format, because your previous experiences tell you that it is impossible to quickly select and show your client the images taken in RAW Want to shoot in RAW, but don't, fearing that they're going to get mired in sorting RAW files Are in constant need of very quick viewing, visually and technically analyzing, sorting through hundreds or thousands of RAW shots, and choosing them for further processing Tired of rendering piles of JPEGs so that you can quickly browse through them with a client, CMO, senior designer, editor in chief, or even your friends and family. Shoot in RAW and are tired of wasting hours or days on looking and sorting through piles of shots
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |